The potential for hyperparasitism to compromise biological control: Why don’t hyperparasitoids drive their primary parasitoid hosts extinct?

Abstract

Predation or parasitism on species introduced as biological control agents is a common explanation for failure of biological control programs. Although there is clear evidence from some biological control programs that hyperparasitism can impact a parasitoid biological control agent, it is not clear whether hyperparasitoids have the potential to cause control failure. We performed glasshouse experiments using cages containing 48 plants to address whether the hyperparasitoid Asaphes suspensus can potentially eliminate a population of the primary parasitoid Aphidius ervi, a biological control agent of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Although As. suspensus has a low intrinsic rate of increase, only one-half that of A. ervi and one-third that of pea aphids, it was nonetheless capable of eliminating the A. ervi population within seven A. ervi generations. In contrast, in the absence of As. suspensus, A. ervi eliminated the pea aphid population. Field surveys, however, found that As. suspensus does not eliminate entire natural populations of A. ervi in lucerne crops, probably due to the high frequency of disturbance that favours high intrinsic rates of increase and short generation times. Nonetheless, the ability of As. suspensus to eliminate A. ervi in cages despite its low intrinsic rate of increase underscores the potential for hyperparasitism to disrupt biological control. Small populations are expected to be particularly susceptible to hyperparasitism, such as when releases of a new biological control agent are made.