Abstract

Trypanosomiasis is a significant productivity-limiting livestock disease in sub-Saharan Africa, contributing to poverty and food insecurity. In this paper, we estimate the potential economic gains from adopting Waterbuck Repellent Blend (WRB). The WRB is a new technology that pushes trypanosomiasis-transmitting tsetse fly away from animals, improving animals’ health and increasing meat and milk productivity. We estimate the benefits of WRB on the production of meat and milk using the economic surplus approach. We obtained data from an expert elicitation survey, secondary and experimental sources. Our findings show that the adoption of WRB in 5 to 50% of the animal population would generate an economic surplus of US$ 78–869 million per annum for African 18 countries. The estimated benefit-cost ratio (9:1) further justifies an investment in WRB. The technology’s potential benefits are likely to be underestimated since our estimates did not include the indirect benefits of the technology adoption, such as the increase in the quantity and quality of animals’ draught power services and human and environmental health effects. These benefits suggest that investing in WRB can contribute to nutrition security and sustainable development goals.

Highlights

  • Trypanosomiasis is a significant challenge for livestock health and economic performance in sub-Sahara Africa (SSA) [1]

  • The k-shift parameter substantially increases by 57% and 114% if the countries adopt Waterbuck Repellent Blend (WRB) at the adoption rates of 25 and 50%

  • The estimated economic surplus is far greater than the expenditure on trypanosomiasis control and eradication for most countries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Trypanosomiasis is a significant challenge for livestock health and economic performance in sub-Sahara Africa (SSA) [1]. It is caused by the trypanosome parasite that causes nagana in domesticated animals and sleeping sickness in humans. International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe) provided by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO), UK; the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida); the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and the Kenyan Government

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call