Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the clinical performance of the HPV E6/E7 mRNA test in cervical cancer screening in China. A hospital-based study was conducted with mRNA, DNA, and liquid-based cytology (LBC) as primary screening tests. Each woman with a positive result received colposcopy with lesion-targeted-biopsy. Histopathological diagnosis was used as the gold standard. The total agreement of HPV DNA and mRNA was 90.7% (95%CI: 87.9, 92.9) with a kappa value of 0.81. The positive rates of HPV DNA, mRNA, and LBC increased with the severity of histopathology diagnosis, from 25.5, 19.1, and 11.4% in normal to 100.0% in SCC, respectively. The sensitivities for mRNA to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ were 93.8% (95%CI: 89.7–96.4) and 95.7% (95%CI: 91.3–97.9), respectively, which were not different from HPV DNA testing (95.7% [95%CI: 92.0–97.7], 96.3% [95%CI: 92.1–98.3]), but higher than LBC (80.4% [95%CI: 74.5–85.2] and 88.8% [95%CI: 83.0–92.8]). The specificities for mRNA to detect CIN2+ (79.0% [95%CI: 74.2–83.0]) and CIN3+ (70.5% [95%CI: 65.7–74.9]) were higher than HPV DNA testing (71.0% [95%CI: 65.9–75.7], 62.8% [95%CI: 57.8–67.5]), but lower than LBC (84.5% [95%CI: 80.1–88.0] 79.8% [95%CI: 75.4–83.6]). All tests were more effective in women older than 30 years. HPV mRNA test showed excellent agreement with the DNA test, with similar sensitivity and a higher specificity in detecting high-grade cervical lesions. It is promising that mRNA test could be used for the national cervical cancer screening to reduce false positive without losing sensitivity.

Highlights

  • It is known that persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus is a necessary cause for cervical cancer and precancerous lesions [1, 2]

  • We evaluated the clinical performance of the HPV E6/E7 mRNA test to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer among Chinese women

  • Specificities for mRNA to detect CIN2+ (79.0% [95% confidential intervals (95%CI): 74.2– 83.0]) and CIN3+ (70.5% [95%CI: 65.7–74.9]) were significantly higher than those detected by DNA (71.0% [95%CI: 65.9–75.7] for CIN2+, 62.8% [95%CI: 57.8–67.5] for CIN3+) (p < 0.05), but lower than those detected by liquid-based cytology (LBC) (84.5% [95%CI: 80.1– 88.0] for CIN2+, 79.8% [95%CI: 75.4–83.6] for CIN3+)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is known that persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) is a necessary cause for cervical cancer and precancerous lesions [1, 2]. Developed countries have begun to use hr-HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening, either alone or co-testing with cytology [5,6,7,8]. Evidence shows that HPV-based screening programs provide greater protection against cervical pre-cancer and cancer than other traditional screening methods, such as cytology [9,10,11]. Since most HPV infections could be cleared spontaneously, HPV-testing identifies numerous infections that will not progress to cervical pre-cancer or cancer, especially in young women [12]. HPV DNA testing is not recommended to screen women under the age of 30. HPV-positive patients referred for subsequent procedures may suffer from unnecessary invasive interventions

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call