Abstract

The excessive permanent deformation (rutting) in asphalt-concrete pavements resulting from frequent repetitions of heavy axle loads is studied in this paper. Rutting gradually develops with additional load applications and appears as longitudinal depressions in the wheel path. There are many causes of the rutting of asphalt roads, such as poor asphalt mixing and poor continuous aggregate gradation. All factors affecting the mixture resistance to permanent deformation must be discussed, and all must be properly considered to reduce the rutting propensity of asphalt-aggregate mixtures. In this study, several mixtures were produced with the most common techniques in rutting resistance (using the most effective additives for each mixture), and their performance was compared with the (conventional) mixture currently used in Iraq. The tests focused on the asphalt-concrete mixture for wearing courses. Different mixtures types were tried, namely, dense hot asphalt mixture (HMA) with two different asphalt contents (4.7% and 5.3%), Open-Grade Friction Course (OGFC) mixture, Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA) mixture, and Beton Bitumineux a Module Eleve (BBME). The modifiers included natural Sisal Fibers (SFs), Carbon Fibers (CFs), and mineral filler (hydrated lime, HL). Marshall test was carried out to find stability and flow values. Rutting was evaluated by the repeated load test for cylindrical specimens under two temperatures (40°C and 60°C) to obtain the permanent deformation parameters. The parameters were used as input to the VESYS 5W software to evaluate the rut depth during different times of design life under 7×10^6 Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESALs). The results of the selected mixtures were compared with the mixture designed in the laboratory dense gradation mix Job-Mix Formula (JMF)) within the limits of the Iraqi specification (SCRB,2003). Manipulation of the aggregate gradation that is customary in the implementation of the local mixture showed that the best performance regarding rutting resistance was exhibited by JMF, which decreased the rut depth at 40°C and 60°C by 21.63mm and 44.304mm respectively, in comparison with the conventional mixture. Changing the aggregate gradation of the local mixture gives better performance in rutting resistance without additives or changing the percentage of asphalt, at the same cost.

Highlights

  • The term "permanent deformation" has been used to describe any distortion of a pavement surface, including shoving and pushing due to mix instability [1]

  • Sisal fiber (SF), Carbon Fibers (CFs) and Hydrated Lime (HL) were used as additives, and 6 Asphalt Cement (AC) mixtures were prepared for wearing a course layer with 3 different asphalt contents, i.e. 4.7%, 5.3%, and 6% depending on the type of mix, by the weight of the total mixture as shown in Tables I and II

  • The results show that in the case of Hot mix asphalt (HMA), a greater increase in stability is observed by adding filler than by adding fibers for the same asphalt content

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The term "permanent deformation" has been used to describe any distortion of a pavement surface, including shoving and pushing due to mix instability [1]. Dense-graded mixes are designed to resist all types of distresses developed from the applied stresses These distresses include fatigue cracking, rutting, moisture damage, and thermal cracking. SFs have good elasticity due to their high moisture absorption capability because of their hollow structure and the large amount of hydroxyl groups in their chemical bonds This ecofriendly fiber is cheaper than synthetic fibers, which are used for technical textiles while it is a useable material for reinforcing dense graded pavement [13]. The end result of a successful mix design is a recommended mixture of aggregates and asphalt binder This recommended mixture includes aggregate gradation and asphalt binder type asphalt binder content are specified based on the JMF along with the allowable specification bands for inherent material and production variability. The Iraqi standard specifications for roads and bridges, SCRB R/9, 2003, allowed the prepared JMF for asphalt mixtures to accommodate some tolerances with regard to the following properties: coarse aggregate gradation, fine aggregate gradation, filler content, AC content, and mixing temperature [17]

MATERIALS
Ashphalt Cement
Aggregates
Mineral Filler Limestone dust from the lime factory in Karbala
Result
Marshall Stability and Flow
PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Suggested Performance Tests for OGFC
RESULTS
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call