Abstract
In 2011 a Committee comprising representatives of the New Zealand Law Society, the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants and an organisation called the Corporate Taxpayers Group published a Report proposing that the General Anti-Avoidance Rule or GAAR contained in ss BG 1 and GA 1 of the Income Tax Act 2007 should be amended. This article assesses the proposed amendments and concludes that, far from clarifying the law as claimed by the Committee, they would have the opposite effect; that they would consequently tend to increase the amount of litigation; and that they would permit forms of tax avoidance currently proscribed. The article concludes also therefore that it would be a mistake for the government to implement the Committee’s recommendations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.