Abstract

Mandatory rules are rules that apply to disregard the law chosen by the parties in their agreement. In this article, we will examine and address the role of international commercial arbitration and arbitrators when facing issues related to mandatory rules. It should be stated that mandatory rules pose conflicts for arbitrators because they place the state’s and the parties’ interests in competition. This highlights the main issue of whether the arbitrator should apply the related law when the parties’ agreement does not include this law. In other words, what should the arbitrator do in this case? The answer to this issue varies due to the variety of ways in which the “nature of arbitration” might be legally interpreted. However, a practical solution is needed. In order to reach a practical solution, the author will assess, from a normative approach, the relative benefits of various methodological techniques and their adjustments that are now in use. Then finally, conclusions will be reached regarding the approach and methodological techniques that best balance the parties' interests.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.