Abstract

The purpose: to develop differential diagnostic criteria of recurrence and scarring by using various MRI techniques.Materials and methods. MRI of the pelvis was performed in 139 patients at different times after removal of colorectal cancer. Recurrence was diagnosed in 48 (34.5%) patients. The shape, size, structure, signal characteristics and the intensity of the accumulation of contrast agent in zones of recurrence and scarring were analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups with different types of postoperative MRI pattern of pelvic: patients without scarring in the pelvis, patients with a homogeneous scarring, patients with inhomogeneous scarring. The present study was compared with MRI data performed in the early stages after surgery.Results. The recurrences with typical MR characteristics were so easy to identify and did not require differential diagnosis. The patients with recurrence occurred in severe scar process in the pelvis needed for differential diagnosis. The detection of recurrence and monitoring of patients without scarring in the pelvis was not difficult. The greatest difficulties arose during the initial examination of patients with inhomogeneous scarring. The difficulties in the differential diagnosis occurred at small sizes of recurrence up to 15 mm, making it impossible to assess their structure and signal characteristics; in the event of relapse in presacral areas of scarring, the presence of areas of hemorrhage in the tumor structure.Conclusions. The presence of severe scar process in the pelvis was the main reason for difficulties in detection and differential diagnosis of recurrence of rectal cancer.

Highlights

  • Цель исследования: проанализировать значимость различных диагностических признаков в дифференциальной диагностике рецидива рака прямой кишки и послеоперационных рубцовых изменений

  • The patients with recurrence occurred in severe scar process in the pelvis needed for differential diagnosis

  • The difficulties in the differential diagnosis occurred at small sizes of recurrence up to 15 mm, making it impossible to assess their structure and signal characteristics; in the event of relapse in presacral areas of scarring, the presence of areas of hemorrhage in the tumor structure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Цель исследования: проанализировать значимость различных диагностических признаков в дифференциальной диагностике рецидива рака прямой кишки и послеоперационных рубцовых изменений. МРТ малого таза выполнена у 139 пациентов в разные сроки после удаления рака прямой кишки. Пациенты разделены на 3 группы с различными типами послеоперационной МРТ-картины малого таза: без рубцовых изменений в малом тазу, с однородными и неоднородными рубцовыми изменениями. Выявление рецидива и динамическое наблюдение пациентов без рубцовых изменений в малом тазу не вызывало затруднений. Рубцовый процесс в малом тазу был главной причиной затруднений в выявлении и дифференциальной диагностике рецидива рака прямой кишки. Основными статистически значимыми критериями в дифференциальной диагностике рецидива и рубцовых изменений были: характеристики контуров, интенсивность сигнала на Т2ВИ и ДВИ. Возможности МРТ в дифференциальной диагностике рецидива рака прямой кишки и послеоперационных рубцовых изменений.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call