Abstract

‘Localisation’ became the new buzzword after the World Humanitarian Summit in 2016. However, the nature of the commitment to localisation since has been questioned. What is ‘the local’? How does localisation work in practice? With little empirical research, generalities in theory and practice have prevailed, preventing a nuanced approach to conceptualising the local. This study aims to build a foundation for the understanding of connotative, nuanced ‘locals’ and to explore the multiple dimensions of the local in both theory and practice. The methodology of a case study research, with a semi-structured and flexible approach, facilitated the identification of different elements of a locally led response that resounded in each of the cases. Combined with a literature review, this article aims to answer the questions: What underlying assumptions regarding the local are found in localisation rhetoric, and how do multi-local dynamics challenge locally led disaster response in practice? Answering this question necessitates deconstructing the multi-local in theory and critically examining expressions concerning the local in practice. In this study, one dimension of the local that was observed was ‘the local as locale,’ with the local describing primarily national actors as opposed to the international, without taking local power dynamics into account. The local was also seen in terms of governance, where local–national relations and intranational strife characterised locally led responses, and the national focus excluded local actors who were not usually involved in governance. The local also became a source of legitimation, with local, national and international actors all using the discourse of ‘the state in charge’ and ‘the community knows best’ to legitimise their own role as response actors while disputing others’ capacities. The multi-local lens provides a perspective with potential to change current practices and contribute to a more transformative agenda.

Highlights

  • When the World Humanitarian Summit was concluded in 2016, one of the major goals for the future of humanitarian aid was to be “as local as possible, as international as necessary,” meaning that international actors would play only a supportive role and only when needed (United Nations, 2016, p. 30)

  • A concept of localisation rose to the top of the humanitarian agenda following the Summit, with commitments made by international donors and humanitarian organisations regarding increasing local leadership, building capacity and directing funds to local- and national-level actors to realise these goals, in the field of disaster response

  • International donors and humanitarian organisations acting upon the localisation commitments would mean a complete transformation of international humanitarianism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When the World Humanitarian Summit was concluded in 2016, one of the major goals for the future of humanitarian aid was to be “as local as possible, as international as necessary,” meaning that international actors would play only a supportive role and only when needed (United Nations, 2016, p. 30). When the World Humanitarian Summit was concluded in 2016, one of the major goals for the future of humanitarian aid was to be “as local as possible, as international as necessary,” meaning that international actors would play only a supportive role and only when needed A concept of localisation rose to the top of the humanitarian agenda following the Summit, with commitments made by international donors and humanitarian organisations regarding increasing local leadership, building capacity and directing funds to local- and national-level actors to realise these goals, in the field of disaster response. International donors and humanitarian organisations acting upon the localisation commitments would mean a complete transformation of international humanitarianism. The local is a strongly multi-valent, even ambiguous, notion that means different things to different people, in different contexts, and for different purposes

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call