Abstract
In the wake of the Charlie Hebdo controversy, debate has focused largely on press freedoms and the (in)capacity of Muslims to comprehend political cartoons. To better understand the range of responses to the cartoons, this article draws on the anthropology of media to demonstrate the cross-cultural interpretive complexities of media texts in general, and political cartoon in particular. Outlining political cartoon’s history and colonial circulations, it argues, on the one hand, that political cartoon is a transparent genre with near-globally recognized conventions. On the other, referencing ethnographic case studies, it demonstrates the intracultural nuances of satire; liberal democratic assumptions about press freedom; and disparate beliefs about the nature of representation, which render considerations of social context paramount. In this way, the article argues that Charlie Hebdo’s political cartoons are “trans/cultural,” requiring that we move between transcultural transparency and sociocultural conte...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.