Abstract

This study explores tariff cooperation under a representative democracy, comparing national welfare realized in three trading regimes: most favored nation (MFN), customs union (CU), and free trade agreement (FTA). Two points are addressed: Why have FTAs increased in recent decades when theoretical studies predict that CUs increase the level of national welfare? Second, why are most CUs formed between countries located near each other while FTAs can be formed between countries located far away? We build a model that examines the effect of trade costs and how tariff policy is determined in a representative democracy. We find that when the countries' income distribution is largely skewed, an FTA is more beneficial due to trade costs. However, when member countries are located near each other, a CU realizes the higher welfare.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call