Abstract

AbstractWhich policies aimed at expanding access to collective skill formation systems receive political support and which ones are likely to be successful? This chapter answers this question by analysing social inclusion policies which were implemented successfully and policies that were proposed, debated but ultimately quashed in Austria and Germany since the 1990s. By theorizing and scrutinizing empirically the preference formation process of trade unions, firms, employers’ organizations, and governments, we shed light on the multi-faceted and variable coalitional politics of socially inclusive measures and draw four conclusions. First, coalitions in favour or against inclusive measures can feature both class conflict and cross-class coalitions. Second, left-leaning governments and unions are most likely to show first-order preferences towards inclusive measures. Third, inclusive measures are politically most feasible when they do not impinge on the efficiency and control dimension. Finally, governments can soften employers’ stance towards socially inclusive measures by granting them more control over the administration of the measures. In sum, the findings highlight the political constraints towards fostering social inclusion through vocational training in the knowledge economy and show how governments can overcome them.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.