Abstract
Recently, there has been a number of criminal cases where Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) has been recognized as a mitigating factor in the commission of crime. In the wake of these cases, feminists are divided on the question of whether the use of PMS as defense or as a consideration during sentencing is in the best interests of women. In this paper, Kendall overviews controversies surrounding PMS as a construct which reflects the experiences of women. Deconstructing PMS in order to reveal its political origins within medical discourse, the author argues that the introduction of PMS into legal discourse will only serve to further disadvantage women. She argues for the development of an alternative and potentially subversive discourse about PMS which reflects women's experiences, but which relocates women's bodies within their social, political, and economic context.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
