Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze international legal regulations regarding cross-border bankruptcy that are not yet fair, and to analyze international bankruptcy legal policies based on justice that can be applied effectively in a cross-border context. This study uses normative legal research. The results of this study are differences in the application of the territorial principle and the universality principle in various countries can cause injustice to debtors and creditors. The territorial principle can make it difficult for debtors who have separate assets in several countries, so they have to face bankruptcy processes separately in several countries, while the universality principle can cause injustice because creditors can be harmed by the application of the debtor's original law which is more beneficial to the debtor. Restorative justice emphasizes the restoration of losses for the injured party. The restorative justice approach can help reduce conflict in the international bankruptcy process and encourage solutions that prioritize mediation in its resolution. With the restorative justice approach, it is expected to provide justice for all parties.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
