Abstract
Using archival sources and interviews with fifty-six participants, this comparative case study examines the criteria determination process in New Mexico, Tennessee, and West Virginia. An enhanced conceptual understanding of policymaking phenomena emerges from case narratives and from the application of three theoretical frameworks—advocacy coalition, multiple streams, and electoral connection.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
