Abstract

Intellectuals who engage in the making and critique of public policy may mobilise historical narrative in their policy discourse. Historiographical issues are therefore sometimes politicised. For both policy makers and historians concerned with Indigenous matters, the notion ‘Aboriginal society’ became relevant in the 1960s. The question of how to address it in policy has been entangled with the question of how to write its history. I illustrate this nexus by briefly examining commentaries by six policy intellectuals — Coombs, Stanner, Hasluck, Langton, Pearson and Sutton — whose thoughts on the Indigenous policy innovations of 1966–77 have included relating those events to underlying historical structures of settler colonial history. In particular I draw attention to historiographical features of two policy revisionists: Noel Pearson’s emphasis on economic history, and Peter Sutton’s concept of ‘liberal consensus’.This article has been peer-reviewed

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call