Abstract
This article uses the concept of “political pharmacology” to show that drugs are complex and mutable entities, the constitution of which is as much a political (power) issue as it is a technical one. The article analyzes the negotiations and struggles that have been involved in the constitution of methadone and heroin as maintenance drugs in Denmark. Danish drug policy on medical-maintenance treatment was for many years dominated by a medico-administrative technocracy. But from the mid-1990s, this technocracy, and the way it defined maintenance treatment and maintenance drugs, was challenged by drug users and other actors. They were, among other things, dissatisfied with the medical constitution of maintenance drugs as “stabilizing medications” and demanded that the drugs should also be allowed to function as “intoxicating substances.”
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
