Abstract
A common view among American higher education scholars is that the sector was governed by a free market during the post-Revolution antebellum period. An analysis of the political economy during the period within the framework of a true free-market for higher education suggests that it did exhibit elements of laissez-faire, but that it was also subject to a substantial amount of market-distorting state intervention. Institutional autonomy and the protection of private property rights post-1819, liberal regulatory regimes in many states, and evidence of market entry and exit support the laissez faire origins hypothesis. Direct and indirect government subsidization, the establishment of state institutions and protectionist policies in some states oppose it.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
