Abstract

Prehispanic South American pastoralism has a long and rich, though often understudied, trajectory. In this paper, we analyze the transition from a generalized to a specialized pastoralism at two geographical locations in the Andes: Antofagasta de la Sierra, Southern Argentina Puna, and the Ancash Highlands, Peruvian North-central Puna. Although at opposite ends of the Andes this herding specialization commences during the same moment in time, A.D. 600-1,000, suggesting that a similar process was at work in both areas. Moreover, this was a process that was irrevocably tied to the coeval development of specialized highland agriculture. From a perspective of political ecology and structuration theory we emphasis the time-depth and importance that Andean pastoralism had in shaping highland landscapes. Taking into consideration risk-management theory, ecology and environment as crucial factors in the development of a specialized pastoralism we nevertheless emphasis the importance of the underlying human decisions that drove this process. Based broadly within the field of political ecology we therefore emphasize how human agency and structure impacted on these landscapes, society and animal husbandry. Our article covers such aspects as the human and animal use of resource areas, settlement location, herding patterns, selective breeding, and human-induced alterations to pasturage.Keywords: Andes, pastoralism, political ecology, Southern Andes, Central Andes

Highlights

  • Political ecology is not a strictly delimited theoretical framework but should be viewed more as a tool for orientation in terms of research and analysis. (Rasmussen 2015: 6)The last thirty years has exposed the inaccuracy of Khazanov's cursory assessment that, "Highland or alpine pastoralism in ...the Andes... never was anything else, than a specialized branch of an agricultural economy..." (1984: xxxvii–xxxviii)

  • Antofagasta de la Sierra and the North-central Andes we study the interplay between people, landscape and technology assessing what these anthropogenic changes implied for land-use and the environment

  • We first assess political ecology and its application to archaeology in general, and to the emergence of specialized Andean pastoralism in particular. We see this specialized pastoralism as the culmination of underlying social, cultural and economic structures rooted in a deep-time development of Andean pastoralism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Political ecology is not a strictly delimited theoretical framework but should be viewed more as a tool for orientation in terms of research and analysis. (Rasmussen 2015: 6). Specialized herding commenced in both areas at roughly the same time (c.A.D. 600-1,000), forcing us to consider the underlining factors that conditioned this increased specialization We maintain that this specialized pastoralism is linked to coeval developments within highland agriculture that encouraged the growth of almost exclusive, though interdependent, herders and farmers within a broader agro-pastoralist social, cultural and economic framework. We first assess political ecology and its application to archaeology in general, and to the emergence of specialized Andean pastoralism in particular We see this specialized pastoralism as the culmination of underlying social, cultural and economic structures rooted in a deep-time development of Andean pastoralism. Based on the conclusions from our case studies we reemphasize the importance that camelid pastoralism had for Prehispanic cultural development, before – but especially for – the period after A.D. 1,000

Towards a political ecology of archaeology
Towards the structuration and political ecology of Andean pastoralism
Case-study 1
Case-study 2
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.