Abstract

Abstract This chapter examines the growing political appeal of economic theories of regulation beginning in the early 1970s, when regulation was still largely seen as a beneficial solution in the public’s interest, to be modified only when economic costs outweighed public advantages. The critique against substantial government regulation, emerging within governmental corridors, was of a revisionist and pragmatic bent. Regulatory reform was seen as a tool for controlling inflation and spurring growth, often implying a reduction in regulations and the incorporation of market incentives in congruence with cost–benefit analyses. Later, in the 1980s, the critique evolved into a more systematic stance, with regulation being viewed not as a solution but as the inherent problem. There was a palpable shift in regulatory approach towards privatized decision-making, endorsing concepts of individual rationality and market discipline.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call