Abstract

The urgency of problem under investigation is caused by scientific and theoretical value and praxiological significance of studying and understanding positive experience of a multi-ethnic region, associated with sustainable development based on regulation of interethnic and interconfessional relations. The article aims at defining place and role of a large-scale museumification of sacral mnemonic and accented scientific and educational activity in system of a regional policy of heritage in conditions of formation of a new political device and cardinal changes in system of spiritual values in Russia between late XIX and early XX centuries. The leading approach used in research is a systemic and functional method, realized in case study method format by means of mobilization of concepts places of the policy of The large-scale museumification and scientific and educational activity corresponding to it are defined in article as systemically important factors in policy of memory and reconciliation. The main signs of an institutional commemoration connected with aspiration of counterparty of policy of memory to adapt opposite traumatic memories within new identity are designated. The research presents stages and features of museumification. It is confirmed by idea of scientific narratives and use of their results in educational and pedagogical activities as an essential condition of semantic content of of memory. The materials of article can be used for further development of problems of historical memory, in process of teaching humanities, and also formation of policy in sphere of interfaith and interethnic relations.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Historical policy in Eastern Europe and RussiaHistory in all forms of its existence has always used political forces as a valuable resource for building and strengthening the system and justification of desirable scenarios of further development

  • The main signs of an institutional commemoration connected with aspiration of the counterparty of the policy of memory to adapt opposite traumatic memories within new identity are designated

  • Having approached the research to the institutional сommemoration, it can be seen that the use of the policy of memory is most characteristic of the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (Rousso, 1999), as the political processes unfolding there demanded the creation of a new identity, a new collective memory of the recent past www.ccsenet.org/jsd Journal of Sustainable Development

Read more

Summary

Historical policy in Eastern Europe and Russia

History in all forms of its existence has always used political forces as a valuable resource for building and strengthening the system and justification of desirable scenarios of further development. Last two decades are marked by non-trivial features of the original marriage of history and politics It is connected with a radical restructuring of the modern historical science, the profound changes in the structure, content and methodology of social and humanitarian knowledge (Repin, 2011), and with a new stage in designing a collective memory and its instrumentalization, accepted as a special state policy (Scherrer, 2009; Miller & Lipman, 2012). Against the background of the transformation of the theme of memory into the point of crystallization of scientific knowledge, to the extent that the meaning of the word "memory" transits into the original meaning of the word "history" and memory is involved in the conflicts of different level and degree of severity (Vasil’ev, 2012; Ankersmit, 2001; Khmelevskaya, 2004) there are new approaches to the development of the past: the preservation of the national heritage, the formation of the policy of heritage on the basis of the national and regional levels, the hegemony of memory as opposed to history, the desire to influence the history (Rousso, 1998; Esh, 2001). The historical policy was developing less intensively in Russia in the first decade of the XXI century than in the neighboring Eastern European countries, but by the middle of this decade it has shown signs of its activation (Miller, 2009)

Heritage Policy Vector in Tatarstan
The Value of the Study of the Heritage Policy in the Republic of Tatarstan
A Research Discourse
Methodological Framework
Narratives - The Condition of Semantics of Places of Memory
Results
Memory Policy Configuration in Tatarstan
Scientific and Educational Component in the Policy of Memory
Discussions
Conclusion
Recommendations
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.