Abstract
The polarity coincidence correlator (PCC) is a useful nonparametric measure of correlation. In this paper, an error is pointed out in the significance test given by Cochran and Gibson (1977). Some further theoretical and practical issues are mentioned pertaining to the use of PCC with physiological waveforms; in particular, problems relating to autocorrelation and the definition of the sampling unit are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
