Abstract

A recent project for JISC Collections – Digital Images for Education – involved acquiring 75,000 still and moving images for use by the UK education community. Creating an aggregated image collection from a wide range of vendors raised considerable logistic, quality and metadata challenges.Those challenges included the need to follow European public procurement regulations; the need to evaluate all the images provided by vendors; the consequences of adopting a common technical standard for describing the content and issues around how the various vendors adapted their disparate metadata and taxonomic standards for the purposes of the project.

Highlights

  • Background to the projectLate in 2008, JISC Collections received funding to develop and enhance JISC’s existing digital repositories, via a project called Digital Images for Education.Under European Union public procurement regulations, vendors were invited to bid to provide still or moving images

  • Successful bids would be added to JISC Collection’s growing portfolio of licensed image content, which is currently available in three separate collections (Newsfilm Online, Film and Sound Online and Education Image Gallery)

  • The decision on which vendors to accept was not taken by JISC Collections, but by a panel of 12 volunteers selected from UK higher and further education establishments, who together had a representative range of educational level and subject area

Read more

Summary

Michael Upshall Creating an image collection

The pleasures and pitfalls of creating an image collection: quality and metadata issues. A recent project for JISC Collections – Digital Images for Education – involved acquiring 75,000 still and moving images for use by the UK education community. Creating an aggregated image collection from a wide range of vendors raised considerable logistic, quality and metadata challenges. Those challenges included the need to follow European public procurement regulations; the need to evaluate all the images provided by vendors; the consequences of adopting a common technical standard for describing the content and issues around how the various vendors adapted their disparate metadata and taxonomic standards for the purposes of the project

Background to the project
Challenges of procurement
The evaluation process
Comparing apples and pears
Achieving consistent metadata
Which standards to use?
Technical knowledge by suppliers
Handling large files
Avoiding duplication
What happens next
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.