Abstract
Previous studies conceive of La Plaza as a simple geographical space that organized crime groups dispute to obtain a monopoly on the market for illegal substances. This interpretation is reduced. It is necessary to conceive of La Plaza as a social actor who, from the implementation of the power, surveillance and punishment control devices (Foucault, 2003), determines the framework of social life, constructs subjectivity and modifies the behavior of actors that interact directly with it (ie, public security agents, rival groups, subjects that integrate it) and the general population. Faced with a state of absent welfare, which no longer creates certainty of incorporation and social mobility, coupled with the sumptuary consumption promoted by the cultural entertainment industry, La Plaza transcends its institutional capacity (Lewkowicz, 2006, Castoriad is, 2007), for a side offer sense of life, on the other by fear of being violated disrupts the biographical trajectories of the population in general.
Highlights
Previous studies conceive of La Plaza as a simple geographical space that organized crime groups dispute to
It is necessary to conceive of La Plaza as a social actor who, from the implementation of the
Escuela para narcos: así se recluta, instruye y mata en un campo de entrenamiento del Cártel Jalisco Nueva
Summary
Abstract- Previous studies conceive of La Plaza as a simple geographical space that organized crime groups dispute to obtain a monopoly on the market for illegal substances. La estructura de la Delincuencia Organizada de Estado[6] (DOE) se constituye a partir de la conjugación de diversos actores e instituciones sociales, que funcionan de manera interna y externa, con el propósito de garantizar el monopolio del mercado de sustancias ilícitas. De esta forma las trayectorias biográficas de los actores, sean afiliados o desafiliados 8, con los que interactúa a su alrededor devienen condicionados: los operadores internos enfocan todos los esfuerzos por mantener o ampliar el dominio de La Plaza; los grupos rivales adecuan sus prácticas para su sobrevivencia y/o expansión; las autoridades de gobierno se ven dispositivos de poder que ejerce para establecer territorios controlados a través del vigilar y castigar, aludiendo ampliamente a Foucault (2003).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
