Abstract

AbstractA key goal of the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement is to keep global mean temperature change at 2°C and if possible under 1.5°C by the end of the century. To investigate the likelihood of achieving this target, we calculate the year of exceedance of a given global warming threshold (GWT) temperature across 32 CMIP6 models for Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) and radiative forcing combinations included in the Tier 1 ScenarioMIP simulations. Threshold exceedance year calculations reveal that a majority of CMIP6 models project warming beyond 2°C by the end of the century under every scenario or pathway apart from the lowest emission scenarios considered, SSP1–1.9 and SSP1–2.6, which is largely a function of the ScenarioMIP experiment design. The U.K. Earth System Model (UKESM1) ScenarioMIP projections are analyzed in detail to assess the regional and seasonal variations in climate at different warming levels. The warming signal emerging by midcentury is identified as significant and distinct from internal climate variability in all scenarios considered and includes warming summers in the Mediterranean, drying in the Amazon, and heavier Indian monsoons. Arctic sea ice depletion results in prominent amplification of warming and tropical warming patterns emerge that are distinct from interannual variability. Climate changes projected for a 2°C warmer world are in almost all cases exacerbated with further global warming (e.g., to a 4°C warmer world).

Highlights

  • ObjectivesOur goal is to study the distribution of threshold exceedance years across CMIP6 models under different scenarios and to understand how UKESM1 is positioned relative to other CMIP6 models in this context

  • Climate mitigation policy is often discussed in terms of limiting globally averaged surface warming to a predefined target, or a global warming threshold (GWT)

  • We explore in detail three primary questions of relevance to the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement: 1) For a range of future scenarios and CMIP6 models, when in the future are specific global warming thresholds (1.58, 28, 38, 48, and 58C) exceeded and what is the spread of these exceedance years across the scenarios and models?

Read more

Summary

Objectives

Our goal is to study the distribution of threshold exceedance years across CMIP6 models under different scenarios and to understand how UKESM1 is positioned relative to other CMIP6 models in this context

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call