Abstract
I HAVE been re–reading Sir Arthur Eddington's recent book with great admiration, but also with grave doubts as to whether his philosophical position is not wholly unsound. I think he employs the word ‘epistemological’ in at least two different senses (‘epistemological–in–form’ and ‘epistemological–in–substance’), and the resulting confusion of thought is disastrous to his proposed new philosophy of science.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
