The Philosophical Implications of Neuroscience Research on Free Will and Moral Responsibility

Abstract

Purpose: This study sought to analyze the philosophical implications of neuroscience research on free will and moral responsibility. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the philosophical implications of neuroscience research on free will and moral responsibility. Preliminary empirical review recognized that the compatibility between neuroscientific determinism and philosophical concepts of free will. It highlighted the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to address the ethical considerations and societal implications of using neuroscientific evidence in legal and ethical contexts. The study emphasized the importance of public engagement to foster informed discourse on the ethical and philosophical implications of neuroscience research. Overall, the findings underscored the complexity of navigating the intersection of neuroscience and philosophy, calling for continued interdisciplinary dialogue to address the multifaceted implications of neuroscience research on free will and moral responsibility. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Compatibilism, Libertarianism and Determinism may be used to anchor future studies on philosophical implications of neuroscience research on free will and moral responsibility. The study provided valuable insights and recommendations across theory, practice, and policy. It contributed to theoretical advancements by synthesizing neuroscientific findings with philosophical theories, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration. In practice, the study emphasized ethical considerations in research conduct and interpretation, aiming to enhance the reliability and validity of neuroscientific evidence. Policy recommendations focused on developing evidence-based policies governing the use of neuroscientific evidence and promoting public engagement and education. Additionally, the study identified areas for further research, such as longitudinal and cross-cultural studies, to advance understanding in the field. Overall, the study highlighted the importance of ethical considerations and responsible innovation in the development and application of neuroscience research. Keywords: Philosophical Implications, Neuroscience Research, Free Will, Moral Responsibility, Ethics, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Neuroscientific Findings, Public Engagement, Education, Ethical Considerations, Responsible Innovation