The philosophical and pedagogical underpinnings shared by philosophy for children (P4C) and Froebelian approaches

Abstract

Recent interest in integrating philosophy in early childhood education has led scholars to explore the potential connections between P4C practices and different educational approaches, such as the Reggio Emilia and Montessori. Murris, for instance, reads the Reggio Emilia approach diffractively through P4C and concludes that the P4C and Reggio approach allow for emergent knowledge production and expression, drawing on all of the child's material-discursive languages and disrupting binary distinctions between child and adult. Scarpini draws attention to Montessori and P4C's mutual emphasis on children's right to think and space to express their thoughts, feelings and ideas together in a safe and dialogical space. The emergence of these theoretical and pedagogical inquiries towards the P4C approach makes Froebelian dialogue even more necessary in terms of developing a well-rounded understanding of embedding philosophy in children's early years experiences. Some ontological and pedagogical resonances between Froebelian approaches and the P4C are reflected to discuss the affordances and challenges of integrating philosophy into children's lives in early childhood education. To do this, diffraction is used as a reflexive methodology for reading Froebelian and P4C texts through and around one another that emerge diverse ontological underpinnings to unpack epistemological possibilities for non-dichotomous early childhood understandings and practices. The aim is to achieve a deeper comprehension of how the two can mutually enhance each other and be implemented in practice to promote more meaningful learning experiences for children in the early years.