Abstract
Edmund Husserl's early and explicit turn towards an egological phenomenology of intentional constitution clouded the waters of the promising phenomenological movement even before it entered the mainstream of philosophical research. A method that Heidegger and others had thought philosophically neutral, especially as it was expressed in the first edition of the Logische Untersuchungen,' all to soon came to reflect a philosophical commitment to a subject of conscious constitutive activity, Husserl's now infamous transcendental ego.' More than one thinker has cut his wisdom teeth convincingly criticizing this move.3 But if such critiques are largely negative - and surely Husserl's critics have mostly failed to match the positive originality and penetration of the analyses he continued to conduct under the aegis of phenomenology - a lacuna is opened up within phenomenology, threatening the continuity and integration of the field. In the search for a positive counterthrust to idealism, phenomenologists have often looked elsewhere, to existentialism, Marxism, and psychoanalytic theory and even to a logical pragmatics, to supply the corrective to what has seemed to be Husserl's
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.