The Pharmacokinetics of Vecuronium in Male and Female Patients

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of gender on the pharmacokinetics of vecuronium, we studied 30 patients (15 male and 15 female) undergoing elective plastic surgery with anticipated surgical blood loss of <300 mL under general anesthesia.General anesthesia was induced with thiopental 4-6 mg/kg and fentanyl 2-4 [micro sign]g/kg and was maintained with 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen and an end-tidal concentration of 1.5%-2% enflurane. After a 2-min infusion of vecuronium 100 [micro sign]g/kg, a modified fluorometric assay was used to determine the plasma concentrations of vecuronium for 5 h. The results showed that, compared with women, the plasma concentrations of vecuronium in men were significantly lower during the first 20 min and that the disposition kinetics of vecuronium can be best described mathematically by a three-compartment open model in the two groups. The volume of the central compartment and the volume of distribution at steady state were 39.6 +/- 8.6 and 164.8 +/- 29.3 mL/kg, respectively, in women. These values increased significantly to 54.4 +/- 14.4 and 201.4 +/- 75.8 mL/kg in men (P < 0.05). When the data were calculated on the basis of ideal body weight, the volume of distribution of vecuronium was also different between men and women (P < 0.05. The half-lives of fast distribution and distribution, the elimination half-life, mean residual time, area under the plasma-concentration curve, and plasma clearance were not different between the two groups. We conclude that the pharmacokinetics of vecuronium are significantly different between genders and that and men have the greater volume of distribution of vecuronium. Implications: The authors found that, compared with women, men had lower plasma concentrations of vecuronium after the IV administration of vecuronium and a larger volume of distribution of vecuronium. The pharmacokinetic differences may be related to the differences in the sensitivity to vecuronium between genders. (Anesth Analg 1998;86:1322-7)