The Personal is (Still) Political: Marriage, Citizenship, and Women's and Gender History

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

In the past year, the political ramifications of so-called personal life, especially marriage, have emerged in unexpected ways. There has been Republican outrage at the so-called tax and panic at the prospect of gay marriages in Hawaii and Vermont. Delegates at the annual Baptist convention declared that it should be harder for couples to end their marriages, and a recent Supreme Court decision affirmed that motherhood but not fatherhood confers citizenship on illegitimate children. These are just some incidents suggesting the degree to which marriage as an institution alternatively delineates and blurs the boundaries between public and private life. Women's history has long been interested in investigating the murky line between public and private life, but few scholars have explored this vexed relationship with the clarity or impact as has Nancy Cott. In Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation, Cott offers a compelling history of marriage as at once that most private and most public of institutions. Cott brings to her history of marriage a formidable history of her own as one of the most influential women's historians in the field. In 1977, she published The Bonds of Womanhood: 'Woman's Sphere' in New England, 17801835. The white women in the domestic sphere who were the subjects of this groundbreaking study were in a bondage, of sorts, excluded as they were from the public sphere of a developing market economy and politics. At the same time, Cott argued that the private bonds between women were empowering and laid the foundation for women's rights advocacy. The clever play on words in the book's title suggested that any simple dichotomy between public and private was problematic. With that insight, Cott helped set the terms of the discussion for the explosion of scholarship on nineteenth-century women that followed-scholarship showing an interest in the private lives of women formerly marginal to historical narratives, coupled with the assumption that this recovery involved more than a straightforward acceptance of separate spheres as a model.1