Abstract

This paper: identifies personal and contextual factors that influence customer experience when service failures occur in rail transport; what is being conveyed through that factor (e.g. older age being used to convey vulnerability); and the implications for future service design. The results are from a thematic analysis of free-text rail passenger complaints (n = 516) reporting service failures that impacted on customer experience. The study differs from existing research on the pertinent personal and contextual factors for public transport service provision in that it: focuses on the passenger experience resulting from specific incidents (rather than evaluative, overall assessments of satisfaction), generates the factors inductively from the data (rather than a-priori) and uses detailed qualitative cases (rather than quantitative survey data). The findings (1) identify some similar factors to those used in previous research and uncover some new factors for both person and context, (2) provide an understanding of what they mean in terms of the passenger experience and (3) indicate how the factors might need to be measured if they are to be used by the rail industry. The paper concludes by using the outcome of an industry-based validation exercise to describe how the findings could be used in future rail services, namely: predicting where the customer experience is going to be sub-optimal, prioritising responses to particular circumstances, and designing services to better meet customer's needs. This exploratory research is timely, given the need for a more passenger-centric approach to service design and future developments such as smart-ticketing, which could potentially enable greater understanding of who is using the rail network and for what journeys.

Highlights

  • Transport is responsible for 23% of total energy-related CO2 emissions (Sims et al, 2014), and, in Europe, passenger cars and vans contribute more than two thirds (Transport & Environment, 2018)

  • In comparison with the existing research, this study identified some similar factors, uncovered some new ones and found some characteristics highlighted by previous research not to be present in the complaints

  • Using a qualitative, ‘bottom up’, data driven approach, this study has identified a range of personal and contextual factors that can influence passenger experiences when service failures occur

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Transport is responsible for 23% of total energy-related CO2 emissions (Sims et al, 2014), and, in Europe (of a 27% total contribution from transport), passenger cars and vans contribute more than two thirds (Transport & Environment, 2018). There is ongoing pressure to reduce personal, low-occupancy vehicle use to counter traffic congestion and climate change. One solution to this is a shift to more sustainable modes, including public transport, and rail is a mode that enables high passenger occupancy and does not contribute to traffic congestion. In the UK, the most recent published figures show that 83% of rail passengers (N 1⁄4 28,238) were ‘very’ or ‘fairly’ satisfied with their overall journey (Transport Focus, 2019), but there remain particular situations where customer experience is poor due to either inadequate service design or, more often, due to service failure. The diversity of rail passengers, the journeys they take, and the complexity of rail system management (Baber et al, 2019), mean that when problems occur (e.g. delays, disruption or accessibility issues) not all passengers are impacted to the same extent, resulting in varied levels of degraded customer experience

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call