Abstract
The periodic table seems to correspond to folding nuclei, a visible proton (nucleon) distribution, that can grow vertical 4 a (representative), 4 b (transition), and 8 c (inner transition) axes (alpha-clusters) bound with valence neutrons standing a core (1st period) of likely expanding in Co, Ni, Rh, and Pd, which was naturally within proton and neutron drop lines, and roughly able to fit in with nuclear fission phenomena, including alpha-cluster decay. It was observed in analysis molecular structures that crosses nuclear, atomic, and molecular three levels, which provides a convenient way that will enable the nature of the periodic table promisingly to become easier understanding.
Highlights
The periodic table with the elements accumulated today is well-known and plays a basic role in physical science.Its nature that is bewildering was traditionally explained by Bohr (1913), an atomic periodicity, though about in the meantime it has been proven to result from the proton number (Moseley, 1913).This seems possible to attribute to that a real cubic distribution of Z in a nucleus might have not been revealed (Bohr & Wheeler, 1939), to the author’s knowledge
118, while noble nuclei appear to close naturally that can display a cubic Z. It was observed in analysis molecular structure starting from a curiosity that whether an atomic mass has an influence upon molecular bond energy about in the summer of 1987
A nuclear coordinate was introduced to describe fission that the serial numbers of axes and layers are after a, b, and c letters; for valence neutron is n that it is clockwise rotating from a1 axis to the origin point: 1→4, 1→8, and 1→16 in the 2-3, 4-5, and 6-7 steps, respectively
Summary
The periodic table with the elements accumulated today is well-known and plays a basic role in physical science. Its nature (shape, Z, the atomic number) that is bewildering was traditionally explained by Bohr (1913), an atomic periodicity, though about in the meantime it has been proven to result from the proton number (Moseley, 1913) This seems possible to attribute to that a real cubic distribution of Z in a nucleus might have not been revealed (Bohr & Wheeler, 1939), to the author’s knowledge. It was an integrative result of atomic dot structure of Lewis, (1916) and nuclear alpha particle model (Hafstod & Teller, 1938) plus valence neutrons (Table 1, Figures 1a-c and 2a-b, most notes in their captions).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
