The period of latency before a muscle receptor generates an action potential as a response to a muscle stretch

Abstract

Six primary (Ia) and seven secondary (II) muscle spindle afferents and eight Golgi tendon organ afferents (Ib) from the tibial anterior muscle of the cat, recorded at the dorsal roots, were subjected to a sinusoidal stretch of the host muscle, the frequency of which increased linearly from 2 to 80 Hz over four different lengths of time. Both the amplitude of the sinusoidal stretch and the prestretch of the muscle were varied. The phase of the action potentials was determined. The phase of the action potential, driven 1:1, increased linearly with frequency. From the gradient of the phase of this action potential the muscle–muscle receptor latency was determined, i.e., the period of latency between the stretch of the muscle and the occurrence of the action potential at the muscle nerve where it enters the muscle. The muscle–muscle receptor latency had values lying between 3 and 8 ms: it was dependent on the experimental parameters and became shorter as the conduction velocity of the afferent fiber increased. In three experiments the muscle latency was determined, i.e., the period of latency before the stretch was transferred from the tendon of the muscle to the proximal third of the muscle belly. The muscle was stretched sinusoidally under the same varying parameters as given above. The length changes occurring in the proximal third of the muscle were measured with a piezo element. The muscle latency was determined from the slope of the phase of the zero points of the sinusoidal piezo length changes; the phase increases linearly with frequency. The muscle latency had values lying between 6 and 15 ms: it was dependent on the experimental parameters. The muscle spindle latency, i.e., the period of latency between the stretch of the polar parts of the intrafusal muscle fibers and the recording of the action potentials from the spindle nerve near the spindle capsule, was determined from 5 Ia fibers and 1 II fiber of isolated muscle spindles. The isolated muscle spindle was stretched under the same varying parameters as given above. The muscle spindle latency was determined from the slope of the phase of the phase-locked action potential. The muscle spindle latency as measured by our method proved to be 0 ms. The latencies of the three elements and their dependence on the experimental parameters are discussed in the light of the transfer properties of the muscle and the muscle receptors.