Abstract

Background & Objective: COVID-19 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been a reference test for diagnosing a disease since the very beginning of the pandemic. COVID-19 serology tests have also been developed and used to estimate the prevalence of individuals who have already been infected. We aimed to evaluate the performance of serology tests for the diagnosis of patients who had been referred to medical centers with acute symptoms.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 80 individuals suspected of COVID-19 who had been referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran, were examined. Upper respiratory tract specimens for RT-PCR and blood samples for COVID-19 IgM and IgG antibody level tests were collected and the results were compared. Results: The overall proportion in agreement, the agreement between positive results, and the agreement between negative results when comparing RT-PCR and IgM serology test were 40% (kappa = -0.006, P = 0.9), 32%, and 66.6%, respectively, and when comparing RT-PCR and IgG serology test were 46% (kappa = -0.006, P = 0.94), 43.5%, and 55.5%, respectively.Conclusion: The absence of a gold standard method for the diagnosis of COVID-19 makes it very challenging to determine the true sensitivity and specificity of different methods. The study results revealed no agreement between the two methods; so the RT-PCR test for upper respiratory tract specimen cannot be replaced with COVID-19 serology test for the diagnosis of patients with acute symptoms.

Highlights

  • We have faced a novel viral respiratory infection since about one year ago [1]

  • This study was performed after obtaining the ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. In this cross-sectional study, 80 individuals were examined to investigate the role of antibody testing, including both IgG and IgM antibodies against SARSCoV-2, in the diagnosis of COVID-19

  • 62 (77.5%) cases were tested positive and 18 (22.5%) cases were tested negative for COVID-19 by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We have faced a novel viral respiratory infection since about one year ago [1]. It seems we have had enough time for developing an accurate and reliable diagnostic test for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there were too many obstacles on the road [2]. In the course of the outbreak, the genome mapping of severe respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) made the utilization of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) operational for detecting the viral RNA [3]. COVID-19 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been a reference test for diagnosing a disease since the very beginning of the pandemic. We aimed to evaluate the performance of serology tests for the diagnosis of patients who had been referred to medical centers with acute symptoms

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call