Abstract

In this study, algorithms to detect post-falls were evaluated using the cross-dataset according to feature vectors (time-series and discrete data), classifiers (ANN and SVM), and four different processing conditions (normalization, equalization, increase in the number of training data, and additional training with external data). Three-axis acceleration and angular velocity data were obtained from 30 healthy male subjects by attaching an IMU to the middle of the left and right anterior superior iliac spines (ASIS). Internal and external tests were performed using our lab dataset and SisFall public dataset, respectively. The results showed that ANN and SVM were suitable for the time-series and discrete data, respectively. The classification performance generally decreased, and thus, specific feature vectors from the raw data were necessary when untrained motions were tested using a public dataset. Normalization made SVM and ANN more and less effective, respectively. Equalization increased the sensitivity, even though it did not improve the overall performance. The increase in the number of training data also improved the classification performance. Machine learning was vulnerable to untrained motions, and data of various movements were needed for the training.

Highlights

  • Falls are one of the leading causes of death among the elderly [1]

  • An inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor has been used for fall detection

  • The signal magnitude vector (SMV) value of the acceleration and the raw value of acceleration were used as feature vectors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Falls are one of the leading causes of death among the elderly [1]. Approximately 28–38% of people over 65 suffer a fall each year [2]. Threshold-based algorithms are mainly used to protect using wearable airbags through pre-impact fall detection [15], and machine learning-based algorithms are used to detect post-falls Several classifiers, such as support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), naïve Bayes (NB), least square method (LSM), artificial neural network (ANN) and others are used to detect post-falls. Özdemir et al [17] used six IMU sensors to distinguish 16 ADLs and 20 falls They extracted data within the 2 s window based on the impact, and extracted feature vectors, such as the mean, variance, skewness, kurtosis and so on from this interval. Gibson et al [18] used one IMU sensor on the chest They extracted data within the 2 s window based on the impact and extracted wavelet acceleration signal coefficients as feature vectors from this interval. ANN exhibited a poor performance compared with other classifiers

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call