Abstract

Biogas production is a key renewable energy pathway for a more sustainable future bioeconomy. However, there is a crucial trade-off between biomass productivity and social-ecological sustainability of available biogas cropping systems. Permanent grassland has been frequently promoted as a promising perennial cropping system for biomass production. Three- and four-cut regimes are usually the highest-yielding and thus preferable for biogas production. A three-year field trial in southwest Germany investigated biomass yield and biochemical composition of mesotrophic Arrhenatheretum grassland under three cutting regimes (two-, three- and four-cut). For the three-cut regime, a preliminary biogas batch test was conducted. The three-cut regime had the highest annual accumulated dry matter yield (11.8–14.8 Mg ha−1), an average specific methane yield of 0.289 m3N kg−1 volatile solids−1 and an accumulated annual methane yield of 3167–3893 m³N ha−1. The four-cut regime performed least favorably due to a lower dry matter yield than the three-cut regime, the highest ash content and the highest nitrogen content. Thus, the three-cut regime promises the best yield performance, whereas the two-cut regime can potentially provide more ecosystem services such as biodiversity conservation and wild-game protection. Consequently, the two-cut regime could help improve the social-ecological sustainability of biogas crop cultivation.

Highlights

  • Grassland-based provision of biomass for bioenergy offers the opportunity to reduce the trade-off between climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation [1,2,3,4,5]

  • For the dry matter yield (DMY), the dry matter content (DMC) and the lignin content, a significant interaction was found between cutting regime and year (Table 4)

  • DMY is shown for each cutting regime and year (Figure 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Grassland-based provision of biomass for bioenergy offers the opportunity to reduce the trade-off between climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation [1,2,3,4,5]. Permanent grassland (PGL) is used as feed for dairy cattle, beef cattle and other ruminants [6,7,8]. Together with other species-rich perennial systems such as perennial wild plant mixtures [10,11,12,13], PGL—in particular grassland mixtures [14]—are considered promising cropping systems for an environmentally more sustainable biomass supply of biogas substrate [15,16]. Grassland can provide regulating services such as biodiversity conservation, erosion reduction and greenhouse gas mitigation [17]. In extensively managed hay meadows, fertilization (nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) leads to reduced species richness due to the promotion of tall-growing

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call