Abstract
Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are commonly regarded as an efficient, low-cost alternative to actively managed mutual funds, yet their perceived superiority is largely anecdotal. We evaluate the performance of a comprehensive, survivorship bias-free sample of US equity ETFs following the same approach that has been commonly used to evaluate the performance of actively managed mutual funds. We find that ETFs have collectively lagged the market by an amount that appears similar to the widely documented underperformance of active mutual funds. We perform textual and regression-based analysis to identify factor ETFs and show that most of these have also failed to beat the market. We conclude that, from a pure performance perspective, the allure of ETFs finds little support in the data.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
