Abstract
Indonesia is a country with the largest Muslim population in the world. However, public interest in sharia banking in Indonesia is not as big as conventional banking. This study aims to identify how the performance of conventional banking and Sharia banking differs using the RGEC approach for the 2011-2020 period by looking at the difference test between the two banks. The difference test uses the Paired Sample T-Test and the Wilcoxon test. The findings show that there are performance differences between conventional banking and Sharia banking. The most significant difference is in profitability that using variable of ROA. Furthermore, a second test was carried out using panel regression to determine the factors that can affect the profitability of the two types of banking, using bank internal factors, namely the ratio of NPL or NPF ratio and LDR or FDR and LDR s well as well as external factors, including inflation and interest rates. The findings show that the NPL has a significant negative effect on the profitability of Sharia banks. Meanwhile, LDR has a negative effect on profitability of conventional bank. Interest rates have a positive and significant effect on both conventional and sharia banking, while inflation has no significant effect on the profitability of the two types of banks. These results indicate that both types of banking need to manage banking performance by utilizing interest rate instruments which have a positive impact on increasing profitability
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.