Abstract
This research investigates the judges’ perception and tendency to refer to the Books of Fiqh (Kitab Kuning). This research focuses on sharia economic dispute settlement in Indonesian religious courts. The research method used combines normative legal and empirical socio-legal research. The results found that the perception and tendency of judges towards several sources of legal rules in assessing, weighing, and deciding a sharia economic case in the Indonesian Religious Courts, did not always rely on one KHES as a material source. In Indonesian law, judges cannot use only one source in resolving sharia economic disputes, such as the Book of Fiqh (Kitab Kuning) only. However, it is an equally important combination, and it can be seen from several decisions of the Religious Courts in Indonesia.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
