Abstract

Sustainability, in terms of ecological, economic, and social sustainable development, and the advancing digitalization represent some of the most substantial societal challenges today. However, little is known about how different actors and decision-makers perceive the relationship of those two challenges. In our paper, by building upon framing theory and social representations theory, we address that gap by investigating how different actors perceive the interrelationship between digitalization and ecological, economic, and social sustainability. Such research is particularly important because understandings of digitalization and sustainability determine how different actors, including managers and policymakers, act in response to those imperatives. Following a multi-method approach, we combined media analysis with two experimental studies examining how various actors frame the relationship between digitalization and sustainability in media discourses and which dimension of sustainability—ecological, economic, or social—dominates. Building upon these results, the studies assess whether the extent of digitalization affects the perception of those three dimensions. Among our findings, perceptions of ecological and economic sustainability but not social sustainability seem to be affected by the extent of digitalization. For future research, those findings indicate the need for a more nuanced view on sustainability that accounts for its different dimensions, especially the social dimension and its relationship with digitalization. Beyond that, because the perceived link between digitalization and ecological, economic, and social sustainability guides how various actors, including managers and policymakers, respond to those imperatives, our work also has substantial practical implications as well.

Highlights

  • Worldwide, current policy and management agendas are dominated by two imperatives: digitalization1 and sustainability

  • Digitalization and sustainability are often mentioned in one breath, they are perceived as stand-alone, indepen­ dent constructs

  • The use of both concepts paints a vague picture of two buzzwords that are popular, as exemplified in Article 16 from 2019: “The whole world speaks of digitalization, Industry 4.0, and most recently about climate change and global warming.”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Current policy and management agendas are dominated by two imperatives: digitalization and sustainability. The complexity and speed of digitalization, paired with the fundamental challenge of achieving sustainable development goals, propel those agendas (George et al, 2016; United Nations, 2016). It is vital to shed light on this relationship as per­ ceptions of digitalization concerning various facets of sustainability determine how diverse actors respond to those imperatives (Dubey et al, 2018). Ecological footprint may opt to reduce business travel in favor of hosting virtual meetings if they believe that an increased extent of digitalization can promote ecological sustainability. European Union (EU) policymakers promote introducing smart meters in households to ach­ ieve the sustainable development goals of the EU (Parliament and Wil­ sen, 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.