Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effect of individual characteristics and attendance incentives on motivation, job satisfaction and performance of education staff at IPB University. Data collection was obtained through distributing questionnaires to 305 education staff from 1,282 populations using disproportionate random sampling through grouping in work units. Data analysis was performed using the Chi-Square cross tabulation test and Structural Equational Modeling-Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS). Chi-Square test results indicated that educational characteristics have a significant relationship with motivation, job satisfaction and performance, while job characteristics have a significant relationship with job satisfaction and performance of education staff. SEM-PLS analysis resulted in the conclusion that individual characteristics have a stronger influence on motivation than job satisfaction, but it has no attachment to performance. Besides, attendance incentives have a greater influence on motivation than performance. The influence of motivation is more dominant on job satisfaction than on performance. Job satisfaction has a positive and significant effect on performance. It is expected that high level of job satisfaction can also result in good performance. Keywords: attendance, job satisfaction, motivation, performance, SEM-PLS
Highlights
This study aims to analyze the effect of individual characteristics and attendance incentives on motivation, job satisfaction and performance of education staff at Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB) University
Chi-Square test results indicated that educational characteristics have a significant relationship with motivation, job satisfaction and performance, while job characteristics have a significant relationship with job satisfaction and performance of education staff
Structural Equational Modeling-Partial Least Square (SEM-Partial Least Square (PLS)) analysis resulted in the conclusion that individual characteristics have a stronger influence on motivation than job satisfaction, but it has no attachment to performance
Summary
Penelitian dilaksanakan di IPB pada bulan Maret sampai dengan Mei 2020. Data yang digunakan adalah data primer dan data sekunder. Dengan sub variabel sikap dan kebutuhan (Stoner dan Freeman, 1994) serta kemampuan (Supriyanto et al 2017), terdiri atas indikator komitmen, peraturan, pekerjaan, insentif, nilai kinerja, jaminan hari tua, pemahaman, dan hasil optimal; b) Insentif kehadiran, merupakan insentif yang diberikan dengan berdasarkan pada waktu kedatangan dan kepulangan kerja tepat waktu. Tabulasi silang digunakan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara karakteristik individu responden dengan motivasi, kepuasan kerja dan kinerja Tendik dengan menggunakan distribusi frekuensi. Aspek-aspek tersebut memiliki peranan yang penting dalam memberikan informasi terkait persepsi terhadap karakteristik individu, insentif kehadiran, motivasi, kepuasan kerja dan kinerja yang disajikan pada Gambar 2. Hasil uji Chi-Square yang diukur dengan menggunakan skala ordinal pada Tabel 1 menunjukkan bahwa karakteristik pendidikan berhubungan signifikan dengan motivasi, kepuasan kerja dan kinerja. Menurut Mardiana et al (2016) tingkat pendidikan yang baik merupakan bekal motivasi yang baik bagi karyawan untuk lebih mencintai pekerjaan yang telah diamanahkan kepadanya
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.