Abstract

An analysis of the penetration–explosion (PE) effects of four distributions of inactive/active composite jets shows that a well-designed inactive/active double-layer liner can promote composite jet damage. Penetration experiments were then carried out for shaped charge jets having a single inactive (Cu) liner or an inactive/active (Cu/Al) double-layer liner with variable liner height. The behaviors and firelight patterns of the different jets were captured by high-speed photography. The perforation, deformation area, and deflection were measured for each plate, showing that the Cu/Al jets have stronger PE effects. Numerical simulation shows that the tip of the composite jet generated from the full-height liner is only Cu, whereas for the other jet, from the double-layer liner, Cu is almost wrapped entirely by Al.

Highlights

  • With smart guidance widely applied in high explosive anti-tank (HEAT), shaped charge jets can avoid the strongest protection and focus on the weakest point of the armor

  • For jets with inactive/active double-layer liners, it is expected that the inactive part of the composite jet will first penetrate the target, and the active part will generate explosion-like damage inside the hole

  • Huang et al designed a K-shaped charge with a double-layer liner consisting of Al/Ni and Cu, and the composite jets created much deeper penetration on steel and concrete targets [23]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Shaped charge jets have remarkable armor-piercing capability and are popular in high explosive anti-tank (HEAT) warheads [1]. Guo et al found that Al/PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) active jets can damage steel ingots much more powerfully, even though their penetration depth is much less [13]. For jets with inactive/active double-layer liners, it is expected that the inactive part of the composite jet will first penetrate the target, and the active part will generate explosion-like damage inside the hole. Huang et al designed a K-shaped charge with a double-layer liner consisting of Al/Ni and Cu, and the composite jets created much deeper penetration on steel and concrete targets [23]. Wang et al studied a reactive material double-layered liner shaped charge and investigated its penetration into thick steel targets, and found that the defeat mechanism includes penetration by the precursor Cu jet as well as the energy release by the subsequent. The same effects were obtained by simulating the jet formation numerically, and the experimental and simulation results were well associated

PE Effects of Jets with Different Elemental Distribution
Elemental
Experimental Setup
Impacting
Damaged
Impacted steel and aluminum plates penetration experiments design
Evaluation of impact on plates:
Impacting Behavior and Firelight
Numerical Simulation of Jet Formation
12. Transformation
The composite je design
15. Their different
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.