Abstract

The crucial role of mutual banks in promoting local development is highlighted by an extensive theoretical and empirical literature. The historical success of mutual banks derives not only from their specific business model, but also from their peculiar and distinguishing corporate governance with member ownership. According to a copious literature, these features have probably allowed mutual banks to better withstand financial crisis. This work compares the cost efficiency of European mutual banks by analyzing a sample which consists of the universe of all the banks operating in Italy, Germany, France and Spain over the period 2011–2016, by employing a stochastic approach (Stochastic Frontier Analysis-SFA) to determine the effects of the recent financial crisis on the efficiency level of this particular kind of bank. The analysis aims to point out the determinants of efficiency in order to understand if the mutual model reveals to be still attractive in the modern banking system. The main contribution of the paper to previous literature consists in comparing different impacts of financial crisis on efficiency of mutual banks in main European countries. Furthermore, the results enrich the recent debate about the cooperative and mutual banking system and its raison d’être. Our results show that the European mutual banks reveal a higher degree of efficiency with respect to commercial banks. Cost efficiency appears to be significantly and negatively related to the level of regulatory capital, the level of credit risk, the level of leverage and the cost-income ratio. On the other hand, it is significantly and positively related to the profitability of the traditional lending activity, to the level of prudence in terms of provisions against credit risk and to the amount of liquidity as a buffer against unexpected troubles.

Highlights

  • The European banking system is characterized by the massive presence of mutual banks that exhibit a business strategy very di®erent from other kinds of credit institutions

  • The geographical composition of our sample is presented in Table 3; it is an unbalanced panel that accounts for 2197 banks for a total of 9477 observations.t. This panel is composed of Commercial banks, Savings banks, Popolari banks and Cooperative banks, but in this work we focused only on mutual banks (Savings banks, Popolari banks and Cooperative banks)

  • The highest e±ciency scores of the mutual banks range between 86% and 89% and they are attributable to banking groups from Italyv and France, while less e±cient banks belong to Spain with a score that ranges between 60% and 73%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The European banking system is characterized by the massive presence of mutual banks that exhibit a business strategy very di®erent from other kinds of credit institutions. This research is based on the hypotheses that (h1) cooperative and mutual banks have historically played a crucial role in thenancial systems of almost all European countries; (h2) their peculiar business model and institutional features provided them quite a success; (h3) in detail, their business has a regional/local focus and (h4) their main goals are the value creation for members and the construction of a long-term relationship based on trust. Cooperative and mutual banks are selfgoverned private organizations and, according to the \principle of identity", members are their main customers and many of their clients are members. (h9) mutual banks actively support the sustainable development of their territory by reinvesting a signicant portion of their available prots back into the community and they could be considered \not-for-prot" banks as their main goal is to increase their members' welfare and not to distribute dividends to them

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.