Abstract
Stress and particularly coping is one of the most widely studied topics in military psychology. That is caused by two main reasons: 1. Military operational environment can be described as extremely stressful. One of the criteria of good military preparedness is the ability to perform in the stressful situations. 2. The price of stress effects on military performance can be very high. This article investigates peculiarities of conscript’s experienced stress and coping according transactional stress model of R. S. Lazarus. Sample of 114 conscripts was participating in the main research. Two scales – „The Primary Appraisal of Military Service Scale“ and „The Conscript’s Experienced Stress Scale“ – were specially constructed for this study. The secondary appraisal of military service was measured with four items proposed by R. S. Lazarus. Coping was assessed by D. Roger „Coping Style Questionnaire“ which was modified by A. Elklit. V. Domanskaitė-Gota and D. Gailienė (Vilnius University) prepared the Lithuanian versijon of this „Coping Style Questionnaire.“ Military service performance was assessed using the evaluation of theoretical tests and general evaluation of physical test.Gathered data confirmed 6 sources of conscripts’ stress. These are: 1) performance of military tasks; 2) tiredness and lack of time; 3) leaders’ behaviour; 4) everyday routine and conflicts; 5) making great demands of conscripts; 6) difficult tasks. It appeared that the biggest stress is caused by everyday minor events (tiredness and lack of time, everyday routine and conflicts), the smallest level of stress is associated with leaders’ behaviour and making great demands of conscripts. The stress level in the beginning of military service can be used for the anticipation of the stress level in the end of military service and also of the experienced stress in military service. Primary appraisal of different military service aspects was strongly related to experienced stress (p ≤ 0.01). Experienced stress was also significantly related to emotional and avoiding coping strategies (p ≤ 0.01). The significant correlation was also obtained while analysing results of military service performance and emotional coping strategy – those conscripts, who use emotional coping strategy more frequently, are worse evaluated for military service performance (p ≤ 0.05). The experienced stress was related to military service performance – those who had experienced small stress were evaluated better for military performance comparing with those conscripts who had experienced big stress.
Highlights
Gintautas ValickasParengus karinës tarnybos pirminio ávertinimo ir kariø patiriamo streso skales buvo iðtirta 114 privalomàjà karinæ tarnybà atliekanèiø kariø
Dar dvideðimtojo amþiaus viduryje kariðkiø uþsakymu atlikdamas streso tyrimus R
Lazaruso streso teorija galima pasakyti, kad pirminis ir antrinis ávertinimas, streso áveika, taip pat streso padariniai turëtø bûti tarpusavyje susijæ
Summary
Parengus karinës tarnybos pirminio ávertinimo ir kariø patiriamo streso skales buvo iðtirta 114 privalomàjà karinæ tarnybà atliekanèiø kariø. Nustatytas statistiðkai reikðmingas ryðys tarp visø tarnybos aspektø pirminio ávertinimo, emocinës, taip pat vengimo streso áveikos strategijos, bazinio kario kurso rezultatø ir visu tirtu tarnybos laikotarpiu patiriamo streso. Svarbiausi tarpininkai tarp stresà lemianèio asmens ir aplinkos ryðio ir streso padariniø yra kognityvinis ávertinimas bei streso áveika (Lazarus, Folkman, 1984). Taèiau kitais atvejais (pvz., nustatant pirminio ir antrinio ávertinimo ryðá su streso padariniais) atliktø tyrimø rezultatai yra prieðtaringi (Dewe, 1991; Folkman et al, 1986a). 2. Nustatyti kariø patiriamo streso, pirminio ir antrinio tarnybos ávertinimo, streso áveikos bei bazinio kario kurso rezultatø ryðá. Galutinæ pirminio tarnybos ávertinimo skalæ sudarë 32 teiginiai, kurie buvo vertinami naudojant 5 balø skalæ (teiginiø vidinis suderinamumas Cronbacho α = 0,9239). Bazinio kario kurso ávertinimai buvo paimti ið kuopø rezultatø suvestiniø ir bazinio kario kurso vertinimo raportø
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.