The peak force to push a trial tibial insert into position cannot be used to select the correct thickness in total knee arthroplasty.

Abstract

An objective of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to restore native (i.e. healthy) function, and a crucial step is determining the correct insert thickness for each patient. If the insert is too thick, then stiffness results, and if too thin, then instability results. Two methods to determine the insert thickness are by manually assessing the joint laxity and by using a trial insert with goniometric markings that measures the internal-external rotation of the trial with respect to a mark on the femoral component. The former is qualitative and depends on the surgeon's experience and 'feel' and while the latter is quantitative, it can be used only with an insert with medial ball-in-socket conformity. An unexplored method is to measure the force required to push a trial insert into position. To determine whether this method has merit, the push force was measured in 30 patients undergoing unrestricted kinematically aligned TKA using an insert with ball-in-socket medial conformity, a flat lateral surface, and retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. During surgery, the surgeon determined three appropriate thicknesses to test from a selection ranging from 10mm to 14mm in 1mm increments. The peak push forces going from an insert 1mm thinner than the correct thickness as determined by an insert goniometer and from the correct thickness to 1mm thicker were measured. Mean peak forces for the different insert thicknesses were 127 ± 104N, 127 ± 95N, and 144 ± 96N for 1mm thinner, correct, and 1mm thicker, respectively, and did not differ (p = 0.3210). As a result, measurement of peak force during trial positioning of a tibial insert cannot be used to identify the correct thickness for all insert designs.