Abstract

The criticism of Cohen and Insel 1 about the Physicians' Desk Reference ( PDR ) is misplaced in that the text of the publication is merely labeling approved by the Food and Drug Administration (ie, the manufacturers' package inserts). 2-4 As labeling, the PDR is subject to the limitations placed on manufacturers for promotion of their drugs, and the deficiencies of labeling, the real target for criticism, are naturally also defects of the PDR . The inadequacies of the PDR have long been recognized by physicians, pharmacists, other health care providers, legislators, regulators, and other users of drug information. 5-11 In fact, it was precisely the major deficiency in PDR content that prompted associations such as the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) 12,13 and the American Medical Association 7,14 to develop and publish alternative sources of drug information that were objective and regularly updated to reflect ongoing research and clinical experience. First

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.