Abstract

From the viewpoint of the pathologist, there are three major issues concerning Hodgkin's disease (HD) that must be addressed. First is making the correct diagnosis; second is identifying any pathological features that may be of prognostic importance; and third is defining the identity of the neoplastic cell. Since Hodgkin's disease (HD) was first described, the origin of the Reed-Sternberg cell and the pathogenesis of HD have remained elusive. Recently developed techniques have allowed investigators to analyze the immunophenotype and genotype of Reed-Sternberg cells. The results of these studies include recognition that, in many cases, Reed-Sternberg cells are of lymphoid origin. Thus, although in most cases of HD the diagnosis is straightforward on routinely stained sections, the conceptual dividing line between HD and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is not as sharp as it once seemed. Occasionally, there is difficulty in distinguishing between HD and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Nevertheless, fundamental differences in the clinical features, histology, immunophenotype, and genotype between non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and HD remain. The impact of histological features on prognosis are controversial, largely because of the excellent prognosis of most cases of HD.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call