Abstract

It is well known that the ambiguity resulting from ordering noncommuting operators is connected with the ambiguity of the lattice approximation of the path integral (PI), When PI quantization is used. We show that for H = 1 2 g ij (q)p ip j + V(q) the ordering is uniquely defined by construction of the PI. A different lattice approximation defines a different ΔV in the action. It reflects the ambiguity in writing H  1 2 g − 1 4 (q)p ig ij(q)g 1 2 p jg(q) − 1 4 = H F + ΔV F , where the subscript F stands for the specific choice of ordering, e.g., Weyl ordering, p̂q̂-ordering, etc.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.