Abstract

This article argues that the new judicial federalism, the increased reliance by state judges on state declarations of rights to secure rights unavailable under the U.S. Constitution, represents not a return to an earlier federalism but rather something new. Although the basis for a state civil liberties jurisprudence had long existed, the “discovery’ of state constitutional guarantees did not occur until the Warren Court pioneered an approach to civil liberties that state courts could emulate. This “discovery” has led to only intermittent reliance on state guarantees. Nonetheless, it is unlikely that state judges will return to the total deference to federal rulings in civil liberties cases that characterized preceding decades.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.