Abstract
No one Evangelist would have sufficed To tell us of the pains of Jesus Christ, Nor does each tell it as the others do; Nevertheless, what each has said is true … Chaucer, The Canterbury Tales Part II sets Ricoeur's narrative theory in the context of contemporary theology. Exegetes and theologians replace poets and historians as Ricoeur's principal conversation partners. Self-understanding and a determination of what is humanly possible are here related to reading the Gospels, for Ricoeur is a philosopher who hearkens to the Christian word. I wager that Ricoeur's narrative theory provides new resources for theology's task of combining a particular historical fate (Jesus' passion) with a universal rational framework (the possibility of freedom). Similarly, Ricoeur's mediation of history and fiction transforms the troublesome dichotomy between the Jesus of history and the Christ of faith. Ricoeur suggests that the indispensability of Jesus for the “Christian possibility” of freedom or “new life” is related to the necessity for the Gospel to be a narrative. But in enlisting the poet as well as the historian to serve the believer, does Ricoeur make Jesus a mere illustration of the Christian possibility rather than its inaugurator? I interpret Ricoeur's philosophy of narrative hope as a “thinking what was left unthought” in existentialist theology.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.